Category: Positive Psychology

  • Emotional Information

    In the previous article on emotional intelligence we saw how an intelligence is based on the ability to think in abstract ways, and to learn and adapt to an environment. Maybe you’d previously heard about how we have multiple intelligences; IQ, social intelligence, practical intelligence, emotional intelligence, and so on.

    What distinguishes these intelligences from each other is the type of information they process. So verbal-propositional intelligence is about vocabulary, sentence structure, etc., and likewise, emotional intelligence is based on emotional information. I just wanted to clarify what this is exactly, as this was missing from the last post.

    What is emotional information?

    Since Darwin, emotions have been viewed as controlling and signalling our responses to situations – they occur in response to the environment and/or an appraisal of it. They are mostly geared towards things that could have an impact on our chances of surviving and reproducing, and each emotion has it’s own particular role to play in this. So for example, anger comes up when someone transgresses against you, jealousy arises when someone’s flirting with your girlfriend or boyfriend, fear in the face of a potential threat, and so on. The theory goes that each emotion was originally ‘designed’ to solve a particular problem we faced in our evolutionary past, by influencing our response to it. So anger might put people off transgressing against you in the future, jealousy helps to ward people off your mate, and fear helps you stay out of trouble.

    Each emotion has it’s own unique signals, which might be facial expressions, body language, voice tone, and so on. This is what ’emotional information’ is. Facial expressions in particular have been particularly well researched. Expressions have been identified for a number of categories of emotion, and wherever you go in the world, you find that these facial signals always go with the same emotions. For example, you don’t find one culture who furrow their brow and pout when they feel ecstatic – everyone smiles. Even hunter-gatherer societies, with no access to our modern culture, signal emotions using the same facial expressions we do.

    So in a sense, emotional information is a kind of language; although it differs from verbal language because it relates primarily to relationships among people rather than relationships in a more general sense.

  • Positive affirmations don’t work!

    …all of the time. Forgive the title, I’m experimenting with controversial post titles. More on that another day.

    Today the topic is self-help again, and if you’ve read this blog regularly, you’ll know that I take a skeptical attitude towards the self-help industry. A quick inspection of the self-help section of a bookstore will explain why – some of these books are just plain ridiculous.

    As I mentioned in the self-help industry and the self-help book reader’s guide, my main problem with this industry is the fact that the authors feel they have the right to make outrageous claims that they can’t back up with solid evidence. Sometimes they’ll give a few anecdotes of times their advice worked – as if that’s supposed to mean something – but often, all you get is pure unsubstantiated opinion, in-between layers of hyperbole.

    So take positive affirmations, for example. You might think “Do you really need evidence? Isn’t it just so obviously true?” The answers are yes you do really need evidence and, no, it’s not obviously true. Just because something is highly ingrained into our modern parlance doesn’t make it true. How a woman carries her baby during pregnancy does not predict the sex of the child. Walking under a ladder isn’t unlucky. No one ever went blind from, well, you know.

    But sometimes these ideas make such pure, unadulterated, intuitive sense, that you can’t help getting swept along. This theory goes like this: If you want to feel happy with yourself and where you’re going, you have to program your mind to think that way. The way to do this, is through affirmation – you repeat, sometimes in your head, sometimes out loud, a positive statement, over and over again. Eventually, your subconscious mind takes this as truth, and you start to feel the way you’ve been affirming.

    The classic affirmation is “every day in every way I’m getting better and better,” but you could try “I am extremely happy,” “I am loved by everyone,” “I am always confident”, or whatever.

    It makes sense doesn’t it? Say positive things to yourself, feel positive. Keep saying them, keep feeling positive. Sort of a priming effect. So simple. So neat and tidy. And everyone else believes it. Don’t tell me it’s not true!

    Some research in this area says that it isn’t…at least not always. A study last year had two groups of people complete a different task each. One did a free-writing exercise for a few minutes, the other said a positive affirmation (“I am a loveable person”) several times each minute for the same time period. Then, measures of mood and self-esteem were taken.

    positive_affirmation
    They certainly do their affirmations… (Credit)

    What happened? For people with high self-esteem, it worked – the high self-esteem people in the affirmation group did end up in a better mood than the free-writing group. But the people with low self-esteem actually ended up in a *worse* mood than the free-writing control group!

    The suggestion is that saying the positive statements only served to highlight, by contrast, just how poor an opinion the low self-esteem people had of themselves.

    This research is not conclusive, of course. There’s more work to be done to discover the individual differences that make a certain technique work for some and not for others – there may be more things interacting with affirmations than just self-esteem.

    So should you do positive affirmations? This one study says that if you’re already high in self-esteem, this might be a useful mood booster. If you’re not, don’t bother.

    However, as always in science the results only support the findings under the exact conditions under which the study was conducted, and there were a few limitations to this one, for example:

    • Only one affirmation was tested: different affirmations may work for low self-esteem people
    • We are not sure what would happen to low self-esteem people after a longer intervention than 4 minutes (could be better, could be even worse)

    But for me, the key point of all this is that the affirmation tested was lifted directly from a self-help book. The author promoted a one-size fits all solution, which was not found to be the case in this study.

    I’m not trying to promote a negative attitude towards the self-help industry – as fun as that would be. If this study says anything, it just says that it’s unwise to accept something because it seems to ‘make sense.’ Sometimes the truth is a little more complicated.

    Reference:

    Wood, J., Elaine Perunovic, W., & Lee, J. (2009). Positive Self-Statements: Power for Some, Peril for Others. Psychological Science

  • A guide to emotional intelligence

    You have probably heard the term ‘Emotional Intelligence’ before, probably along with bold claims like “emotional intelligence matters twice as much as IQ” (1), or 80% of success is accounted for my emotional intelligence. But leaving the hype aside for a moment, what exactly is emotional intelligence, and is there any truth to these incredible claims?

    A quick guide to emotional intelligence

    As a field, emotional intelligence is quite a confusing because there are a number of different constructions, each with slightly different definitions. The leading model, and the one with the largest research base, is the Mayer-Salovey model. In this model, emotional intelligence is defined as the capacity to:

    • Accurately perceive emotions
    • Generate emotions so as to assist thought
    • Understand emotions and emotional knowledge
    • Regulate emotions to promote emotional and intellectual growth (2)

    In other words, it’s the “cooperative combination of intelligence and emotion” (3). This model also views emotional intelligence as an ability, or set of skills, rather than a trait or a ‘gift’.

    This framework of emotional intelligence does not make the bold claims you might have heard of. These belong to other models, and in fact, researchers using this model actively try to expose these popular but unfounded claims. If you’re reading up on emotional intelligence and come across contentions, then make sure you keep your skeptic’s hat on because you might be reading something that isn’t supported by the research.

    The four branches of emotional intelligence

    The skills and abilities that make up emotional intelligence can be broken into four ‘branches’:

    1) Perception and expression of emotion

    Branch one is the ability to recognise emotion signals in other people, through their facial expressions, bodylanguage and voice; including the ability to detect false emotional expressions. It also involves the ability of a person to express their own emotions through these same channels. An example might be the salesperson, who knows just when the prospect is ready to buy.

    2) Using emotion to aid thought

    This branch reflects a sensitivity to the fact that certain emotions are more suitable for certain types of thinking than others, and the ability to intelligently draw upon this knowledge as required. An example could be the entrepreneur, who knows that good moods help him come up with original ideas, so he boosts his mood somehow before a brainstorming session.

    3) Understanding emotion

    Branch three is the analysis of emotions, an awareness of the trends of emotions, and an understanding of what outcomes usually result from which emotions. It includes the ability to label and distinguish between different emotions, their intensity, and the transitions between different emotions. A high level of skill in this branch reflects a high degree of self-awareness.

    4) Managing emotion

    This represents the ability of an individual to manage their own emotions and the emotions of others, in line with their particular goals, their self-knowledge, and social norms. An example could be the young child who is taught to count to ten when feeling angry, or the sports coach who motivates his team at half time a la Al Pacino in Any Given Sunday.

    The order of the branches represents the extent that the ability is integrated into the rest of a person’s psychology. That probably requires a bit more explanation. If you imagine that you have a set of emotional systems in your brain (which you do), branch one is the most deeply integrated into these ‘hard-wired’ systems, while branch four will be the least integrated into these, and the most open to variation through experience. This fits into other observations, such as the Paul Ekman’s fascinating research, where he demonstrated that tribal cultures with little exposure to outsiders used the same facial expressions to display the same emotions as the rest of the world (branch 1), and the differences between cultures in which emotion is appropriate to display when (branch 4).

    And that, in a nutshell, is it. Hopefully this quick guide to emotional intelligence gave you a more realistic view of what it is, without the hype that usually comes along with it.

    References:

    (1) Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. NY: Bantam.
    (2) Mayer, J.D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (p 3-31). NY: Basic Books.
    (3) Mayer, J.D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D.R. (2004). Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Findings and Implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), p197.


    Recommended Reading:

  • Positive Psychology Resources

    If, like me, you’re studying positive psychology, or if you’re keeping up with the field for personal or professional reasons, you will find the following links useful.  They are great for finding new information and opinions, and especially for getting hard-to-find journal articles in PDF:

    Positive Psychology Search

    – The Google of positive psychology

    Positive Psychology News Daily

    – Great site, regular updates.  Written mostly by current and former positive psychology students.

    Friends of PP

    – Very good email list.  Very frequent emails, so DO NOT sign up to this with your usual email address!

    Authentic Happiness

    – This is where to find all the questionnaires for happiness, character strengths, and so on.

    Researchers and Labs

    Places to find journal articles and in-press papers of researchers.  Most researchers have a webpage, but I’ve only included those you can get papers from.  The topic areas are not exhaustive, they’re just to give an idea of the main research interests.   Some are not ‘positive psychologists’ as such, but their work overlaps.  I haven’t found everyone, but will update as I find more.  If you know any more, please leave a comment with a link.

    Robert Biswas-Diener

    – Well-being, strengths, coaching; this is the guy that travelled the world studying happiness in various cultures.

    Richard Davidson

    – Mindfulness meditation, emotion, neuroscience, neuroplasticity, general brain stuff; this is the guy that did the brain scans of trained Buddhist monks.

    See also: Lab for Affective Neuroscience (Wisconsin)

    – The lab that the above guy is the head of.  Lots of stuff here.

    Edward Deci / Richard Ryan

    Self-determination theory – very comprehensive site, probably all you will need on this topic.

    Ed Diener

    – Subjective well-being/happiness and related topics.  One of the main researchers into well-being.

    Barbara Fredrickson

    – Positive emotions, happiness, she came up with broaden-and-build theory.

    Compassion Lab (umich)

    Jane Dutton et al “We are a group of researchers working in business schools who strive to create a new vision of organizations as sites for the development and expression of compassion. “

    Gallup Research Reports

    – “Gallup experts and senior scientists are continually analyzing Gallup data and sharing their findings with fellow academics, researchers, and opinion leaders.”

    Daniel Gilbert

    – Useful site to stumble on, click “writing” for papers, his blog is also good.

    Jon Haidt

    – Morality.  See both the ‘Research and Publications (Full List)’ and ‘Positive Psychology Stuff’ sections.

    Barbara Held

    – A philosophical psychologist with some interesting critiques of positive psychology.

    Todd Kashdan

    – Well-being, abnormal psychology, mood, anxiety.  Author of “Curious?”

    Marcial Losada

    – “Interaction dynamics and productivity of business teams.”  Discovered the ‘Losada Line’; the 3:1 ratio of positivity to negativity that effective teams display.

    Sonja Lyubomirsky

    – Happiness, positive emotions.  She wrote the popular book “The How of Happiness”

    Barry Schwartz

    – If you’re not spoilt for choice already, here are Schwartz’s papers. (scroll down for the ones with pdfs; older papers only).

    Martin Seligman / Positive Psychology Centre

    – Positive Psychology’s founder, Martin Seligman runs this centre. Hover on ‘PPC research’ for papers.

    Ken Sheldon

    – Goals, motivation, psychological needs, plus many other topics. Lots of papers available here.

    Michael Steger

    – Meaning and quality of life.

    Heather Urry / Emotion, Brain and Behaviour Lab (Tufts University)

    – “Studying the brain and body correlates of emotion, from reaction to regulation”

    VIA Institute

    – Values In Action model of strengths homepage.  For some reason they only offer abstracts, but it’s a good starting point.

    Leave a comment, if you know any more.

    If all of this means nothing to you:

    What is Positive Psychology?

    One answer: What is positive psychology?

    Another answer: What and Why is Positive Psychology?

    Some good blogs on positive psychology:

    http://www.centreforconfidence.co.uk/pp/emilysnews.php

    What About Non-Academics?

    The above sources are journals/technical papers.  If that’s not your cup of tea, try the following books (full disclosure: all are Amazon affiliate links):

    And the following sites:

  • Rewards and Motivation

    You’ve probably heard the advice “When you’re doing well, give yourself a reward!” – it finds its way into just about every self-help book you’ve ever picked up.  But are there any times where this is bad advice?  Why, yes there are – when your motivation for a task is intrinsic.

    I have explained what intrinsic motivation is and how to get it in “What’s your motivation?”, but briefly, extrinsic motivation is where you perform some task to achieve some benefit at the end of it, and intrinsic motivation is where the reward is the activity itself, rather than from any benefits that may come as a result of it.  For example, if you play football for the fun of it you’re intrinsically motivated, but if you playing football to lose some weight you’re extrinsically motivated.  And there are shades of grey between the two.

    If you’re intrinsically motivated to do a task, you’re in a good place.  Say you love writing.  You’re more likely to sit down and do it, because you enjoy it for it’s own sake, and you’ll probably be better at it as a result. 

    But if you start receiving money for writing, something strange happens.  

    “Intrinsic motivation is hindered by tangible rewards.”

    A part of you thinks “I’m doing this for the money”.   Intrinsic motivation comes when our needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness are met; anything that provides for these needs will tend to increase intrinsic motivation, anything that undermines them will decrease intrinsic motivation.  Receiving money for writing is an external control – it will undermine autonomy to some extent, because you are not doing the task purely for the enjoyment of it.  

    Intrinsic motivation goes hand-in-hand with enjoyment of the activity, performance, vitality, and self-esteem.  If you’re intrinsic motivation takes a hit, these things potentially could too.

    Maybe this is why a band’s second album usually isn’t as good as their first?

    Effective Rewards

    So is there a way to receive a reward without it being seen as controlling?  Yes, by making it unexpected.  Unexpected rewards have no bearing on intrinsic motivation.  Obviously, if you’re using rewards on yourself, you can’t very well  give yourself a surprise reward.  Even if you set up a clock with a randomised timer, you’re still expecting it to go off at some point.  

    But if you’re a manager, going up to someone at a random time and saying “Bob, you’ve done well this month.  We’re giving you an extra $300!” will not undermine intrinsic motivation, whereas saying “Bob, do well this month and you’ll get an extra $300!” will.

    Important note: Remember, this only applies to intrinsic motivation – those times when a task is already interesting.  If you look at the previous article on this subject, you’ll see that in the diagram (scroll down a bit), there are a few types of extrinsic motivation.  If the motivation for an activity is currently extrinsic, it’s OK to use rewards.  

    For example, if you really don’t want to go to the gym but know that you must, then it’s OK to get a movie as reward for completing your workout.  Or if you’re an employer and there’s a repetitive or more dreaded part of the job, rewards will increase your employees motivation to do it.

    Positive Feedback

    The above only applies to tangible rewards.  Money, gifts, cookies; whatever.  If the reward is verbal, different rules apply – positive feedback will actually enhance intrinsic motivation.  This seems to be, in part, because a verbal reward tends to be unexpected.  It’s not like your boss ever says “Bob, do a good job this month and I’ll give you some positive feedback!”

    “Verbal rewards can enhance intrinsic motivation – if they’re seen as informational

    There are several studies that confirm this.  They look at times when the participants are told to expect an evaluation of their performance on a task.  An anticipated evaluation that includes positive feedback does seem to undermine intrinsic motivation.

    But the primary reason that positive feedback is effective is that it provides a feeling of competence to the recipient, one of the three requirements of intrinsic motivation mentioned above.

    Because of this, if positive feedback is given in an authoritative and controlling way, it too will undermine intrinsic motivation.  So verbal rewards need to be informative, not controlling, and preferably not given solely in expected appraisals.

    Again, this is more difficult to apply to self-administered rewards.

    Careers

    One interesting question raised by this research, is what would happen if you take something you love, and try to make a career out of it?  While previously, you only played the violin or wrote poetry for pleasure and relaxation, now part  of your motivation is to make money, pay the bills, achieve recognition in your field, and so on.

    The data suggests that your intrinsic motivation would be undermined by this, to some extent.  

    But as mentioned above, intrinsic motivation comes from three sources – autonomy, competence, and relatedness.  Entering a career as a violinist might open you to relationships with other like-minded individuals, which could compensate for the extrinsic rewards.

    You could always consciously make effort to increase autonomy, competence and relatedness.  More on that in this article.

    Children

    When it comes to children, just throw the whole rule book out of the window.  With a predictable awkwardness so typical of their kind, children respond differently to rewards than adults do.  

    Firstly, in terms of tangible rewards, children are more detrimentally affected.  So tangible rewards must be used carefully with kids, so as not to negatively affect their intrinsic motivation.

    Secondly, verbal rewards appear to have no effect on intrinsic motivation in children.  See.  I knew they didn’t listen!

    Whatever you do, don’t take the above two paragraphs as advice.  I’m just putting this information in the article in case any parents reading this were planning to use their child as a guinea pig – things work differently for kids, so don’t bother trying!  

    Now, I’m not saying you shouldn’t turn the apple of your eye into a psychology experiment, for the good of science; only that you should seek the advice of a professional or find a proper source of information first!

    Abstinence

    Just a final note based on my experiences with quitting smoking and other things.  If you need motivation to abstain from a particular thing, many sources recommend rewarding yourself with that thing.

    Example – you’re trying to quit junk food, so if you’ve managed to refrain from eating burgers all week, the advice goes, go ahead and chomp down on the weekend, to get the craving out of your system.

    Mileage may vary, but I would advice you NOT to reward yourself with the thing you’re abstaining from!   I think it’s a rationalisation, an excuse to hop off the wagon.  For me personally, it also seems to increase cravings, not reduce them.  There might be some neurological explanation for this; I know there is for smoking, but it might be the case when quitting other things too.

    So if you’re quitting junk food, reward yourself with a night at the theatre, a new hair cut, an item of clothing etc – not a cheeseburger.

    Recommended Reading:


    References:

    Deci, E., Koestner, R. & Ryan, R.M. (1999). A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. Psychological Bulletin. 125:6, 627-668

  • The Happiest Country

    “When I am abroad, I always make it a rule never to criticise or attack the government of my own country. I make up for lost time when I come home.”
    – Winston Churchill

    It’s not easy running a country – governments have a difficult job.  They have to take care of the health, wealth and security of millions of people, and unfortunately for them, the better they are at it, the more people seem to expect from them.  They’re also the first people to take the blame when things go wrong.

    But, it is certainly true that some governments aren’t quite up to scratch.  Some are better at governing than others.  But which?  What yardstick would you use to determine this? GDP?  Lack of corruption?  Health of the citizens?

    Or would all of this be irrelevant in comparison to the happiness of the people?

    The Kingdom of Bhutan in South Asia has placed Gross National Happiness as its chief concern, over financial issues.  They avoid environmental destruction, and try to preserve the culture and traditions of their country, to foster a strong national identity.

    That’s a pretty interesting stance to take, compared with the the money-focused west.  I wondered whether the people of Bhutan are happier than westerners are, so I tried to find out.  The first data I found looking happiness and nation was in Daniel Nettle’s book, Happiness: The Science Behind your Smile.  By the way, that book is well worth getting – it’s cheap and a quick read (you’ll probably get through it in an evening), yet it manages to cover the happiness research comprehensively without being too technical.

    Here’s the average happiness scores on a 1-10 scale.  Find your country!

    happinessofnations

    Note that the original data is from reference (1).  Looking at the table, Switzerland came out top, and Bulgaria lowest in this sample of countries.  The lower scoring countries are the poorer ones and the former communist ones – all the events and changes that took place in these countries seem to have given the people some understandable discomfort.

    I expected Japan to be higher as I’d heard many good things about the quality and ease of life there.  The UK are high in the list, which is good to know since I live here, although we might be helped out by the Irish, as I recall another study which said Northern Ireland was the happiest country within the UK.  The US, along with its constitutional right to pursue happiness, is up near the top too.

    Why are these countries happier?

    So what is it about how these countries that makes the differences in happiness?  The most obvious difference is wealth; countries in poverty are far less happy overall than the wealthier ones.  But the correlation isn’t completely linear, because once countries are out of poverty, the benefits of wealth level off.

    This is a problem with the western ‘pursuit of property’ culture, which involves getting as rich as possible and using the money to make better homes, sanitation, central heating, and other comforts.  It works, until the basic needs are met.  Then the benefits tail off – it seems like money can only get a country to a certain happiness point, after which we adapt to further luxuries.

    What about our friends in Bhutan?  Well, this study did not collect data there, but another one by Adrian White includes some data that was collected there.  White took the happiness data from another study, the Happy Planet Index (HPI), and put it into a mapping program. (2)

    According to this study, Bhutan ranked 8th out of 178.  If this is correct, it’s impressive, considering Bhutan has one of the lowest GDP’s (on the map, Bhutan is the tiny dark red country, bordering with China to the north and Bangladesh to the south).

    However, there is some controversy over this paper.  Apparently, in the original study from which the map was made, data did not exist for 80 of the 178 countries, and the happiness levels were simple estimates.  This complicates things, because it isn’t clear whether Bhutan was one of the countries that was estimated.

    So, I dropped an email to the HPI team – the people who actually collected the data.  Nic Marks himself gave me an ultra-fast reply.  He’s a good person to speak to about this, because he actually advises Bhutan on their gross national happiness work.  He had this to say:

    “Yes the bhutan data for HPI 2006 was estimated but not as per all the other estimations as we had access to one survey within the country … however in retrospect not a reliable estimate really … we have new better estimate but it is still an estimate …  what i can say is that it is much lower than the 2006 one and basically would suggest that Bhutan suffers from rural deprivation like other developing countries …  however it is not as low as its GDP would suggest it should be … “

    So the money-focused west appears to be happier than the GDH-focused Bhutan; but Bhutan does better than other countries of a similar wealth.

    Happiness + Ecological Efficiency

    Marks also mentioned that there’s a new Happy Planet Index coming out next month.  I’ll probably get that, because the HPI is such an interesting concept.  They combine life-satisfacion measurements with ecological efficiency.

    Their aim is to discover whether it’s possible to use a country’s resources in an efficient way, to bring happiness to the people without damaging the environment.  The rich west may have happier people generally, and better health, but these countries also have a far larger impact on our planet’s environment.  So in the HPI, these countries would be penalised.  Presumably this is why it’s called Happy Planet Index – it measures how ‘happy’ the planet is as well as the people on it.

    The global HPI map can be seen here.  Comparing this to the previous map, you can see that the golden bubble of north America, western Europe and Australia take a hard hit when environmental impact is added in. (it’s confusing but the colour scheme changes – red is bad in the HPI graph but good in White’s happiness one).

    Who comes out best in the HPI?  Vanatu is first, with Columbia second and Costa Rica third.  Switzerland, our leaders in happiness, fall to 65th place, while the US falls to 150th.  The UK is at 108th place.

    The implication is interesting.  Happiness, for many people, is life’s ultimate goal.  Particularly materialists, who do not believe in anything other than matter.     Ayn Rand would be happy with that reasoning – if there’s nothing else to existence but the physical world, then your own happiness may be the highest goal – along with a sense of morals that involves not interfering with another’s happiness.

    Many people have belief systems that transcend normal human experiences (religion, spiritual beliefs, and so on), and they have their own reasons for believing in a higher goal than happiness.  But if a materialist agrees that pursuing happiness should include the clause of not interfering with another person’s happiness, this logic has to include people who don’t yet exist.  What’s the point of having a happy nation if the next generation are unhappy because of it?

    If it’s not right to go up to someone and knowingly make them unhappy today, it must also be wrong to knowingly make someone unhappy who doesn’t yet exist.  So finding ways to increase happiness that will not have a negative impact on the happiness of future generations is a higher goal than pure, immediate happiness.  This might seem obvious, but I think it’s true that “what’s measured improves”, so I find it interesting and encouraging that there’s a measure of well-being that takes ecological efficiency into account.

    Keep your eye on http://www.happyplanetindex.org/ next month; the new index is released then!

    References:

    (1) Deiner, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being.  In Kahnemann, D., Deiner, E., and Schwartz, N. (1999).  Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology.  Russell Sage Foundation: NY.

    (2) White, A. (2007). A Global Projection of Subjective Well-being: A Challenge To Positive Psychology?  Psychtalk, 56, 17-20.

  • "You can do anything you set your mind to" Vs "Stick to your strengths"

    This title fight pits two classic pieces of folk wisdom against each other! Both ideas are fully indoctrinated into our culture, but which one is correct?

    Introducing first, in the red corner, hailing from the depths of human optimism, the current, reigning and defending champion: “You can do anything you set your mind to!”

    And in the blue corner, hailing from parts unknown, weighing in at a few books and some empirical studies, the challenger: “Stick to your strengths!”

    Scheduled for three rounds, this might be the biggest title fight in the personal development history! The outcome of this fight might determine what you choose to do with the next phase of your life, and change your destiny forever!

    Or, it might just be mildly interesting. Either way, keep reading.

    Round 1 – Definition

    What exactly does it mean to say “You can do anything you set your mind to”? It’s a tribute to the power of dedication, persistence, and time, or course. It means that even against all odds, these three pillars will support your success; all you have to do is try hard enough for long enough.

    This perspective may or may not include the idea that “all men are created equal”. It may or may not concede that certain things comes easier to some people than they do to others. The phrase simply means that over the long-term, no inherent talent or current ability will play a greater role in getting you what you want than the above three factors.

    “You can do anything…” is simply a tribute to the power of dedication, persistence, and time.

    Of course, this is a very positive and uplifting message. It gives us hope and makes us all that little bit more equal. So naturally, it’s a popular concept within motivational literature.

    What about the opponent? When we say “Stick to your strengths”, what do we mean by that? We mean actions you can consistently do well, which lead to productive results. We also mean useful traits, and strengths of character.

    A strength is a label given to a part of your brain or nervous system that is more efficient than other parts. As you go about your life, different types of thought, behaviour and feeling are called upon, either by your own actions or in response to something happening to you. The requests that your brain processes quickly or effectively are your strengths.

    In Now, Discover Your Strengths, Marcus Buckingham uses a technological analogy. He explains that if your brain is like the internet, with the synapses in your brain being equivalent to the different connections between computers, your strengths are like your T1 lines (or whatever technology happens to be fastest at the time you read this!). They process input and provide an output much faster than other areas of the brain.

    If you’ve got a tendency to respond to the world with what we’ve labelled “kindness”, it’s because the synapses that lead to altruistic actions are strong and fast. Nature always takes the path of least resistance, so when you perceive an opportunity to be “kind”, you usually take it. So the idea behind the saying is, shape your life around your strengths, because it will be hard or even impossible to go against the grain.

    Round 2 – Evidence

    Try googling “You can do anything you set your mind to”. You’ll find a load of very inspirational articles, each containing examples of people who have defied the odds. A cancer-ridden triathlon winner, an entertainer who succeeded across multiple fields, a man who became a kickboxing champion in six weeks. From this, the articles conclude that yes, you can do anything you set your mind to. These people did, so why can’t you?

    Well, maybe it’s because these examples have all been selected specifically to support that point! I could write an article called “You can’t do anything you set your mind to” and fill it with some great examples of human failure – unsuccessful political systems, disastrous military campaigns, music careers that never left the ground; it would be no more valid. More on why, here.

    We need stronger evidence than this. It comes in part, from Carol Dweck. Dweck and colleagues have studied the effect that beliefs about intelligence can have on various types of task performance. Basically, if you believe intelligence is a fixed entity, you’ll perform worse than if you view it as malleable. In the book, Why Smart People Can Be So Stupid, Dweck’s chapter explains these concepts and gives examples of some of the studies that have been done. For instance, when college students were taught that intelligence is malleable, their GPA increased, along with their commitment to their school work.

    These results show that positive beliefs about the effects of effort can increase performance and motivation. So far so good, but they don’t explain how far a person can go with this. For that information, we turn to a different area of research.

    Some interesting studies have been done on the effects of deliberate practice. At low levels of practice, things like genetics and natural aptitude account for most of the variation in ability. But after ever increasing amounts of practice, the sheer volume of training starts to take over, and eventually it accounts for more ability than any other factors. In many fields, it was found that no one had reached the level of mastery without around 10 years of deliberate practice, involving about 10,000 hours of training. This is regardless of natural strengths or ability. (1)

    That’s a strong case for the champion, but what about the challenger?

    “The ‘best of the best’ shape their lives around their strengths.”

    The Gallup Organisation has been very active in researching strengths. As part of their work they interviewed over 2 million individuals in almost all professions, looking for patterns between the top achievers. They found that the “best of the best” shape their lives around their strengths, and found ways of developing and applying these strengths in the areas they wanted to become effective in.

    So while practice might override talent at the highest levels, it seems it’s easier to get there by using practice that involves strengths: If this wasn’t the case, Gallup would have found many top achievers who weren’t employing their strengths. (2)

    Researchers have also looked at the quality of activities that employ strengths versus those that don’t, finding that people are more intrinsically motivated to do activities which use their strengths. (3) In my own dissertation, I found that people using their strengths experienced more flow (the state of being ‘in the zone’, totally focused on the task), and enjoyed the activities more.

    Perhaps because of the above benefits, people who start to use their strengths on a regular basis become happier. One study asked people to integrate their strengths into their lives, and measured their happiness over the next six months. They found their happiness had increased each time it was measured. In StrengthsQuest, Donald Clifton and Edward Anderson note that regular strengths use leads to more confidence, optimism, and direction in life. (4)(5)

    Round 3 – A thought experiment

    Let’s take the points from the previous round and see how they might work in an example.

    Imagine two people, Bob and Jane. Bob is extroverted and full of zest, with a natural sense of humour. He’s always ‘on the go’, looking for something fun to do. Jane is introverted, intelligent, and prudent. She spends most evenings in front of a fireplace with a good book. How well would each of them do in the role ‘stand up comedian’? Could Jane, do well in this field, if she put her mind to it?

    If self-help books could speak, they’d chorus an enthusiastic ‘yes’. People supporting a strengths perspective would answer a resounding ‘no’. Who’s right?

    “Going against the grain would be a tough, inefficient, unsatisfying way to reach excellence.”

    The work on dedicated practice suggests that given enough practice, and a long enough timeline, the answer is, yes, Jane could be an expert comedian. Of course, Bob could get there more easily; he would find more satisfaction in practising, be more motivated, and progress faster. Because Jane is going against the grain, her success depends on whether her natural tendencies allow her to get enough practice in. The process of reaching excellence would be a chore, and she’d have more setbacks and frustrations to overcome. But if she could find a way to keep going, in theory, she could make it.

    I say ‘in theory’, because in practice it’s probably rare that someone could maintain that level of training without any intrinsic enjoyment of it. Without love for the activity itself, it’s easy to imagine Jane burning out long before reaching 10 years and 10,000 hours of practice. It would be a tough, inefficient, unsatisfying way to reach excellence.

    On the other hand, employing strengths is much easier. Bob would be happier overall, have more motivation to practice; for him, it will all just seem easier and more natural. Another great example is The Beatles, who clearly had a natural aptitude for music, and loved performing. They had clocked up nearly 10,000 hours of practice before they even released a single – they are an extreme example of what can happen when you combine your strengths with massive amounts of practice, rather than have the two work against each other!

    Final Bell!

    When the final bell rings, both fighters are still standing. The first two rounds were pretty even, both combatants landing some strong blows. But in the third, “You can do anything you set your mind to” started looking a little worse for wear. “Stick to your strengths” is your winner and new champion, earning the victory on points!

    When people say “you can do anything…”, they mean that even against tough odds, you can succeed if you have enough persistence and determination. While that may technically be true, the phrase speaks only of the end result, and says nothing about the quality of the journey we must undertake to get there. By sticking to your strengths you reduce the number of options you have, but what you lose in quantity you make up for in quality. Unless there is some hugely important reason to go against your strengths, or a massive sense of meaning you attach to it, being happier and deriving more satisfaction from what you do is always going to be the better option.

    Recommended Reading:

  • Self Determination Theory – Finding the right kind of motivation

    After you saw ‘motivation’ in the title of this article, maybe you thought this would be one of those moving, inspirational pieces, designed to spring you into action, immediately.  You know the sort; written in a lively and stimulating way, they bestow you with a sense of purpose and enthusiasm that you’re certain to carry with you for at least the next ten minutes.

    But it’s not.  I’m not really qualified for that, to be honest.  To me, the people that write those things seem like some kind of super-efficient neo-human.  Like they leap out of bed at 6am every morning (doing their affirmations before they land), do some morning yoga, then in an efficient and streamlined way, get a full day’s work in before 9am.  Yikes!  On a morning, I’m barely conscious enough to make my fried egg sandwich for breakfast.  OK, a little more conscious than that, but you get my point.

    So I’m not explaining how to increase motivation, but rather I’m describing the types of motivation that exist.  If you find yourself with ‘no motivation’, maybe it’s not that you don’t have any, but that you have the wrong type.

    Two Main Types of Motivation

    Motivation is a useful thing.  It’s the driving force behind our behaviour.  It produces.  But it’s not necessarily a single concept – there are many types of motivation.  You could break it down in many ways, but almost any will include the two main types: extrinsic and intrinsic motivation.  With extrinsic motivation, you’re doing something because the activity will bring some reward or benefit at the end of it.  With intrinsic motivation, you’re doing something purely because you enjoy the activity itself.

    For example, take job hunting.  Chances are, job hunting isn’t on your list of hobbies.  You probably don’t spend your spare time filling out applications and going to interviews just for the fun of it (or maybe you do).  People do it because they want the outcome – a job.  And it seems to me that in the majority of cases, the motivation to go to these jobs is extrinsic too.  Would you do your job even if you didn’t get paid for it?

    Of course, things aren’t this black and white in real life, there are shades of grey between the two extremes, which I’ll describe later.  But it’s interesting to note that over the life-span, we start to take less intrinsically motivated actions.  As children almost everything we do is for the enjoyment of it; this spontaneous learning and curiosity is vital for our cognitive development.  As we get older, rules and regulations mean that most of what we do is extrinsically motivated to some extent.

    The Benefits of Intrinsic Motivation

    Think about some of the things you do on a regular basis.  Are you mostly extrinsically motivated, acting in preparation for rewards to come?  Or are you mostly intrinsically motivated, seeking engagement and well-being within the things you do?

    It should come as no surprise that the more intrinsically motivated an action is, the more enjoyable it is; it’s practically the definition.  So from the point of view of pure enjoyment, it makes sense to have more intrinsically motivated activities in your life.  People who are intrinsically motivated show more interest and excitement over what they do, and have more confidence. (1)

    But apart from the pure enjoyment of the activity, you’re actually better at intrinsically motivated actions too.  You show more persistence and creativity, and because of that you’ll have increased vitality and self-esteem. (1)

    As I mentioned earlier, there are shades of grey, and you don’t need to be fully intrinsically motivated to get these benefits.  In various fields, positive outcomes have been found from motivation that is almost, but not quite intrinsic.  To name a few, these include: exercise, where it is easier to stick to exercise routines as intended; religion, where people who identify with their religion have better mental health and well-being than people who see religion as a means to an end; and environmental behaviours, where more intrinsic environmental motivation leads to more activities that are better for the environment. (2)

    So if you want to do more of something, you could try to change your motivation to something closer to intrinsic motivation.  If you do so, your performance will improve, and you’ll generally be happier.  Before explaining exactly how that’s done, I’ll describe the shades of grey that exist between the extremes of motivation.

    Shades of Grey (or orange)

    The gradations of motivation have been classified by psychologists Richard Ryan and Edward Deci of the University of Rochester, in what they call Self-Determination Theory, or SDT for short.  In this model, the types of motivation exist on a continuum, with pure intrinsic motivation on the right, amotivation on the far left, and four shades of extrinsic motivation in between them.  Your motivation towards a particular activity will fit into one of these categories, although there may be some overlap with its neighbours. Here’s the diagram they use to illustrate this (opens in new window):

    The Self-Determination Continuum
    The Self-Determination Continuum

    From left to right, we have:

    • Amotivation – The state of lacking the intention to act.  In this state, a person either won’t act at all, or will ‘go through the motions’, lacking any specific purpose or intention.
    • External Regulation – Activities are done purely to satisfy some external demand.  When doing externally regulated activities, people typically feel controlled or alienated.
    • Introjected Regulation Behaviours are still performed to achieve a reward or avoid a punishment, but these things are internal; for example, to avoid guilt or anxiety, or to boost the ego with pride.
    • Identified Regulation – This reflects a conscious valuing of a behavioural goal – they are activities people identify with, that are seen as personally important.
    • Integrated Regulation – An identified regulation has been fully integrated into the self.  It has been brought into congruence with the other values and needs a person has.
    • Intrinsic Motivation – An activity is carried out purely for the inherent satisfaction of doing so.

    (The diagram and these notes are based on reference 1)

    For example, I try to do some form of exercise 3-4 times per week, usually weights.  For me, this is integrated regulation.  It’s been a regular part of my week for over 10 years, and it fits in with my other values and habits.  Still, it’s not intrinsic.  Despite how integrated it is, and how congruent it is with the rest of me, if it didn’t make me stronger, healthier, and look good naked, I doubt I’d do it.  Imagine a guy who does not value health or fitness, and only works out so that people react to him more positively.  For this guy, it’s introjected regulation – his motive is ego-based, he does it to maintain self-esteem.

    On the other hand, playing the guitar is 100% intrinsically motivated for me.  No one hears me, I don’t play to anyone but myself, and I don’t have any goals with it whatsoever.  I scarcely even try to get better, I just enjoy playing a few songs I know.  But I only play very rarely; in fact, my guitar isn’t even in my house presently.  It’s not an integrated behaviour, but I’m intrinsically motivated to do it.

    If you have a goal you’re working towards, where is it on the scale?  Where’s your profession?  If it’s far to the left, but important to you, you can take steps to move it to the right, but note that this isn’t a developmental scale – you don’t figure out where you are, then move through all the stages, mastering each one on your way to intrinsic motivation.  Ultimately, the procedure to move a regulation further to the right is similar wherever you start from.  However, if you’re not already intrinsically motivated, you might just end up at integrated – which shares many of the benefits.

    How to develop intrinsic motivation

    There are many things that we have to do in this complex modern life, and we can’t expect everything to be intrinsically motivating.  But since it seems worthwhile to get more of our actions to the right side of the continuum, the question is, how do we stay motivated to do nonintrinsically motivating things?  The answer lies in our psychological needs.  Intrinsic motivation is developed and maintained when three of our basic psychological needs are satisfied.  These needs are competence, autonomy, and relatedness.  They are thought to be essential to human motivation and growth.  Here’s a description of each and suggestions for how to satisfy these needs. (3)

    Autonomy is the need to have control over what you do – to self-regulate, and make your own choices.  I talked about its relation to happiness here.  You’ll see that in the diagram above, the more to the right you go, the more internalised the behaviours are within the self – in other words, the more they feel ‘you’.  This process involves adopting values from other people and from the environment.  But a new value needs to be understood and synthesised with existing goals and values, which is a self-directed process – we need the opportunity to freely subscribe to new values.  Any external pressures and controls will obstruct this process.  As well as the integration of values, autonomy is important in a more general sense – having control over what you do and how you do it.  The more control you feel you have, the more intrinsically motivated you’ll tend to be.

    How to support autonomy:

    1) Increase Control/Choice – Find ways to direct your actions and environments.  Things as simple as controlling the layout of your furniture have been shown to increase autonomy, right up to having ultimate control over what you do.  See what you are able to control and have choice over.

    2) Integrate Values – Think about the ways in which you agree with the actions you’re taking.  Why are they right and correct?  Considering the value of a behaviour to yourself will facilitate its integration.

    3) Create Novelty – Look for ways to inject novelty into your actions.  Can you do the same thing in a different location, or alter the task or goals in some ways?  Or can you even find new reasons to do them?  This way you’ll get the benefits of increased novelty as well as autonomy.

    4) Remove Deadlines – Deadlines will reduce intrinsic motivation drastically.  Even if it’s a task you really like to do, the pressure of a deadline will remove your sense of autonomy and your motivation along with it.

    5) Remove Pressured Evaluations – As with deadlines, high pressure evaluation will also reduce your autonomy and your motivation, and should be avoided if possible.

    Competence refers to our innate drive to engage new challenges and experience mastery – to get good at things.  For motivation, perceived competence is the important thing, rather than objective performance.  Positive feedback on performance tends to enhance a person’s perceived competence, but only where they feel that they are responsible for the good performance.  If they feel they did well by chance, and then receive positive feedback on the performance, this will tend to undermine intrinsic motivation because it will overshadow their feelings of autonomy.  So it’s better to say what a person did well, rather than just saying “heck of a job, champ!”

    How to support competence:

    1) Get better – Sounds obvious, but the more competent you are at a certain activity, the more motivated you’ll be to do it.  If you’re trying to learn a new skill and losing motivation because it’s difficult, at least take heart in the knowledge that the better you get, the more motivated you’ll typically get.

    2) Get positive feedback – Your motivation will become more integrated if you can find some way of getting positive feedback on your progress.  This feedback should be informational rather than controlling, and should highlight specific positive aspects of your performance. (4)(5)

    3) Avoid negative feedback – Likewise, negative feedback will stand in the way of perceived competence, and therefore block intrinsic motivation too. (6)

    4) Break complex tasks down – If a task is very complex and challenging, don’t take it on all at once.  Break it down into moderately challenging subtasks.  Once competence has been reached for each of the subtasks, then move on the the task as a whole. (7)

    5) Set appropriate difficulty levels – Difficulty needs to be moderately challenging – not so easy that you become bored, but not so difficult that your feelings of competence diminish.  If a task is too easy or hard, find some way to adjust accordingly.

    Relatedness is the basic human need to feel connected to others. SDT suggests that people naturally internalise and integrate the values of the social groups around them, and as they do so, their motivation to do things in line with this new value system will improve – as long as they do not feel coerced, and have a sense of competence.  This natural human need seems to be a part of our tendency to merge into social groups.  Knowing this, we can hijack this system, and use it to consciously internalise behaviours that we want.

    Relatedness is not essential for intrinsic motivation, which we can achieve alone (like my guitar playing, although some might say other people are better off not hearing it…).  But, it is very important for internalising and integrating behaviours and activities – bringing activities into the ‘good’ side of extrinsic motivation.  Note that researchers have not yet found high levels of intrinsic motivation without autonomy and competence to go with it.

    How to support relatedness:

    1) Improve the interpersonal climate – in group situations, the atmosphere should be supportive and informational, as opposed to pressuring and controlling. (8)

    2) Find social groups – When people feel involved with groups that espouse certain values and behaviours, the way is smoothed for these values to be integrated.  By finding groups that embrace the values and behaviours you want, you can adopt them yourself by joining these groups.

    3) Supportive social connections – Friends, family and associates that are autonomy supportive and competence supportive (eg., encourage you to make choices, give positive feedback and encouragement, have the same values as you, and so on) will be generally beneficial to integration and intrinsic motivation.

    When you’re using this model to increase your motivation, there are two ways to go about it.  The first is to look at your life as a whole, and shift things around so that these three needs are better met.  For example, switch jobs to one that better meets the above criteria, use your spare time for things you enjoy doing simply for their own sake, spend time with people of similar values, etc.  This way, you’ll experience more integration and intrinsic motivation overall, and as the research indicates, greater well-being and psychological health will follow.  If there’s a regular part of your life which thwarts these three needs, it would be worth thinking up ways to get out of it.

    The second way, is to to take an activity that is important to you, but you are extrinsically motivated to do, and then integrate the three needs into the activity, such that they are better satisfied.  This will increase your integration relative to that specific task.  That’s what I’ve assumed you would be doing as I wrote this, so I’ve written the above suggestions from that perspective.

    If you’re trying to motivate yourself to do something, this by definition is a self-determined process.  So it would make sense to adopt more of a self-determined motivational style, rather than spend all day recanting affirmations, and reading uplifting stories.  You can read all the motivational literature you like – and these things are well enough in their own way – but according to this theory, if you’re not doing anything to meet the three needs of competence, autonomy and relatedness, you might as well read cereal packets.

    Recommended Reading:

  • How to be Happier – 10 positive psychology interventions

    This is the practical part of this series on happiness. It’s quite long, and not necessary to read through it all. The only essential part is “The Happiness Formula” – after that feel free to bookmark or skim, if you prefer not to read the whole thing.

    This article is different to the other “how to be happier” articles I found on the internet. The other stuff seemed to be more inspirational and uplifting rather than practical. I found advice like ‘smile more’, ‘be myself’, and ‘get a cat’. This article differs because it’s not just 10 pieces of advice I made up as I went along. It’s a review of different methods that have been tested scientifically. They’re tested in the same way drugs are: measure happiness before, give the intervention, and measure happiness after.

    You’re not supposed to do everything at once! This is just a resource of ideas for you to try. If you want to be thorough, you can measure your happiness with a scale, try something out for a week or two, then measure again. You can find many scales here (Authentic Happiness Inventory is probably the best one to use; the site is free but requires registration).

    The Happiness Formula

    What your instincts tell you about how to be happier is probably wrong. Most people try to change their happiness by changing their circumstances. The logic is, by changing their life situation to one they are happier with – more money, better house, different gender, whatever – they’ll become happier because they like the new situation more.

    This idea is basically misguided, although true to an extent. The happiness you experience comes from three sources; your genetics, your life circumstances, and your intentional activities, split like this:

    So the ‘happiness formula’ is this:

    Happiness = Genetic Set Point + Life Circumstances + Intentional Activities

    We’re stuck with our own set of genes for life, so no luck there. Our life circumstances are only slightly relevant. This includes where you live, your gender, health, money, marital status, and so on. We can change all of these, but they only take up 10% of the happiness pie. Ten percent is not insignificant, but the most logical place to take action is ‘intentional activities’ – anything you deliberately think or do. (1)

    This might seem backwards, but it makes sense when you add in the concept of adaptation – many things give us a boost in happiness, but we adapt to them over time, and the happiness wears off. Circumstances are more long-standing. Intentional activities are short-term: no time to adapt.

    So take marriage. Marriage is long-term, and seems to make most people happier for a few years, before they adapt to it. But expressing gratitude to each other, having those awful picnic things where you feed each other food (yuck!), talking about all the other disgustingly romantic things you did together; these things boost happiness, but as they are episodic there’s no adaptation to them. You just have to keep doing different activities.

    The following are ideas all fit into the intentional activities slice of the pie.

    1) Expand your Social Network

    Social relationships are a bit of an exception to the above rule, because they’re something we don’t adapt to. If you have close relationships in your life, you’ve got a regular source of happiness (unless they are bad relationships, of course).

    It’s possible to live alone in this world – if you could get a job with no human contact, and afford a house and food you’d be able to survive. But ten thousand years or so ago, you’d be dead without relationships. No one in your tribe would help you out and you’d have no allies if some cave-criminal decided to steal your lunch. For that reason, we have a brain system that ‘rewards’ us with happiness if we make a new friend or even just have an interesting conversation with someone.

    Aha, you might say, I know a person who really likes their own company more than other people! Yes there are some people like that, but a group of mischievous researchers once took a group of introverted people, and forced them to talk and relate to people, and even they enjoyed it. (2)

    If you’re on a quest for success, like getting a load of money or building a strong business, some people will tell you that’s a bad idea. Don’t put all your time into it at the expense of your friends and family, they say. It’s not what’s really important, etc.

    But they are actually right. You’ll probably still want your success, but it would be useful to remember that you will adapt to success, you won’t adapt to relationships, and that wanting something and liking it are different things.

    How to get more social ties into your life is a whole other series of articles. Obvious ideas are find work that involves human contact or working in a team, join clubs, learn social skills, and generally just get out more.

    2) Change your Thinking

    Our actions can be broken down into three things – thoughts, emotions, and behaviours. Any one of these things will affect the other two. If you feel happy (emotion), you’ll tend to have happy thoughts too. If you furrow your brow and shout aggressively (behaviour), you’ll start to feel angry (emotion). And if you think that your life is terrible and there’s no way out for you, soon enough you’ll start feeling sadness and despair. Feeling sad will make you take the actions of a sad person, which will make you think more sad thoughts, and downward spirals like this can sometimes lead to depression.

    Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is a form of psychotherapy intended to break people out of downward spirals of this kind. The main method used is to intervene at the ‘thought’ stage of the spiral, by teaching people how to logically challenge the thoughts that are leading to the negative feelings and behaviours. Negative thoughts have predictable structures, which have been identified and labelled. There are specific challenges for the different types of thought, clients are trained in them, and use them whenever such thoughts occur.

    So for example, as soon as the client thinks “I always do stupid things”, he recognises this as an over generalisation and challenges it with counter-questions like “is there a time I didn’t do a stupid thing?” His questions expose the logical flaws and weaken the negative feedback loop. There are also sometimes ‘homework’ assignments, addressing the ‘behaviour’ part of the spiral, such as exposure to gradually more anxiety producing situations.

    CBT doesn’t necessarily prevent the natural occurrences of negative thoughts, but can stop them turning into huge downward spirals, and also interrupts current spirals that are already spiralling. This doesn’t mean that it will only work for people who are unhappy to start with. Everyone experiences setbacks at various times, and this is where it can be useful to have a better way of dealing with them. It’s a tool you can use to take a more optimistic outlook on something.

    A good book with exercises based on CBT is Martin Seligman’s Learned Optimism. Most of the other books and websites I found on CBT were focused on treating specific problems like anxiety and depression. These are good for learning the techniques and methods of CBT, which you can then apply to your thoughts in general. Of course, if you believe you suffer from a serious condition, you should seek the advice of an expert rather than try to self-medicate.

    3) Meditation

    There’s a mystical image surrounding meditation. When I talked with people about it, I got the impression it’s seen as, new-agey, and a bit ‘out-there’, perhaps involving people in orange robes chanting “oohhmm.” In reality, it’s just a practical exercise for training the mind, just like you train the body. There are many different types, but the one I’m talking about here is called mindfulness meditation, and this itself is taught in various ways and known by different names. Vipassana is one form you might have heard of (as practiced by celebrities such as Madonna and Rivers Cuomo).

    Mindfulness meditation involves deliberately directing your attention to something, typically your breathing or an object, and not allowing any thoughts to enter your head as you do so. As soon as your mind wanders, you just become aware of it, acknowledge it, and bring your attention back to the breathing. You do this for 20 minutes a day or so, building up the time you do it for. Very simple, but not very easy.

    So it’s about learning to control your awareness so that you can place it wherever you want, which will usually be wherever you are at that particular time. You know all this “be in the moment!” spiel that you seem to hear everywhere these days? That might well be good advice, but without telling you how to control your attention, it’s a bit like saying “be physically strong!” without giving a weight-lifting program. Mindfulness is one way of controlling your attention.

    And it also makes you happier. In one study, participants were given an 8-week program in mindfulness meditation. After the program, EEG scans measured increased activation in the left side of the anterior cortical area of the brain, the area associated with positive emotions. Additionally, the participants were given the influenza vaccination at the end of the program, and the meditators actually had a stronger immune response to it than the control group. (3)

    Jon Kabat-Zinn’s book Wherever You Go, There You Are is a very good introduction to mindfulness, and you can also find a video of a speech he gave here, where he describes what mindfulness is and how to do it. (the instructions start at around 24mins). Finally, there’s a very thorough and free mindfulness resource at http://www.vipassanadhura.com/howto.htm.

    Beyond this, there are also courses around the world teaching mindfulness meditation. Many of the courses are free, like the Vipassana ones, which basically involve going to a retreat for 10 days and meditating for 18 hours a day. Sounds very intense. So investigate this further if you want more instruction.

    4) Positive Reminiscence

    In a way, this one is the opposite of the meditation I just mentioned. In meditation, you generally move your attention away from thoughts, and certainly don’t encourage them. In positive reminiscence, you deliberately think about your various happy memories. When people were asked to spend 15 minutes a day for 4 weeks reminiscing on happy memories, they ended up happier than groups asked to think about neutral or sad memories. (4)

    It’s important that you’re just reminiscing, and not analysing. In another study participants were asked to systematically analyse their happy memories – this actually caused a reduction in happiness. Any skilled meditator would probably predict this, as a big aspect of meditation is learning to think non-analytically. It seems that analytical thinking, and creating judgements around thinking, is not useful when happiness if the goal.

    So as long as you’re just reminiscing, and not evaluating the past, you’ll be OK. Remember; 15 minutes a day. Don’t sit there daydreaming and wasting your time away.

    5) Pursuing Goals

    Some scientists believe that happiness is a system built into our brains to help us reach goals. When we progress to our goals, we become happier, when we’re lagging behind, we get less happy, even anxious. That’s partly why humans like challenges. Well, most of us do; some prefer to simply sit down, eat and watch Prison Break. But for the rest of us, making progress towards a goal will bring happiness along with it.

    A study in the early 1990s found that the more committed to a goal you are, and the more attainable it seems, the happier you are when you reach it. Another in 2002 found that if you train people in how to set and reach goals, they experience more positive emotions, vitality, and wellbeing. So it seems that if you are committed and strategic about it, your goals will work better for you – probably because you have more chance of reaching them! (5)(6)

    But remember what I said earlier about adaptation – the happiness from a goal being reached won’t necessarily last, so setting one like earning more money is a lot like running on a treadmill – you’ll break a sweat but you’re not going to get anyway. You’re like the donkey trying to reach the carrot.

    There are resources to help you set and follow goals all over the net and in self-help books, so I won’t go into it here.

    6) Writing

    When I say ‘writing’ I’m referring specifically to things like journals and diaries. Although writing in the ‘Dear Diary’ sense is stereotyped as ‘for girls’, historically it’s been popular with both genders. You can buy the The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin from Amazon very cheap. I did. It’s quite good, he was a very industrious and motivated chap, which I suppose you’d need to be if you wanted to help found a country.

    There are two types of writing you can do. I’ll call these disclosive writing, which refers to writing about negative or distressing events, and positive writing, which is writing about positive things you want to happen.

    Disclosive Writing

    A massive amount of research has been done on this – a review in 2005 analysed 146 experiments, and found it to be effective (7). Essentially, you write about negative or traumatic events, and the structured nature of written language causes you to create a narrative out of the event. When systematically structured like this, the event is more easily processed by your mind, and you get a better sense of understanding and closure. The more ‘insight’ words (eg, understand, realise) and ‘causal’ words (eg, because, reason) that end up in the narrative, the stronger the effect is. This shows that the benefits come when writing is used to help make sense of bad events.

    The book Writing to Heal has exercises on how to do this. It’s written by James Pennebaker, one of the major researchers in the area.

    Positive Writing

    With positive writing, you don’t write about happy memories. Breaking down a negative event can help remove negative feelings, but as we’ve already seen, you don’t want to be analysing or evaluating positive events – in your head or on paper. Why would you? If you want the feeling that they create, you can elicit that by reminiscing – there’s no need to structure a narrative around it.

    Instead, with positive writing you write about what is termed your ‘best possible self’. This is quite a self-helpey exercise, but there is research behind it. You imagine yourself as you’d like to be, on paper. It’s as simple as that, just write out in detail what your future is like after you’ve met all your life goals realised all your dreams, and so on. I’m not sure why this works, maybe it helps you to stay optimistic, or maybe it has a similar function as creating a goal, giving you something to aim for. Whatever the mechanism is, it does seem to work.(8)

    7) Expressing Gratitude

    Gratitude, if you didn’t know, is a sense of thankfulness and appreciation aimed towards something specific. It’s a positive emotion in itself, so it’s not too much of a surprise that feeling grateful more often will be good for your happiness; but there’s more to it than that.

    Gratitude can be used as a coping strategy, to reframe a negative experience in a positive way. You broke your leg, but you’re grateful you didn’t break both. When directed at experiences in the past, it serves to help savour them.

    Remember, we adapt to many events that make us happy, and they lose their magic after a time. If you get a new car, it makes you happy for a while because you can compare ‘new car’ with ‘old car’. A year down the line, you’re comparing ‘new car’ with ‘new car’ – you’re used to it. With gratitude, you are countering the effects of adaptation to an extent, by manually overriding what is being compared.

    A popular gratitude exercise is called ‘three good things’. It’s simple; every night you write down three good things that happened to you that day, and why they happened. In one study, happiness gradually and consistently increased over six months of doing this (9). In another ten-week trial, participants ended up happier, in better physical health, and strangely, were spending more time exercising. (10)

    This is a simple exercise, and doesn’t take up much time, so it’s certainly worth a try. But be aware that the results are modest initially, and it takes some months for the effects to build up.

    8 ) The Gratitude Letter

    If you scanned this page to look at the headers, you’d probably find some to your liking, and others you didn’t like the look of. The gratitude letter is one that is seriously not to my own liking! Maybe it’s a side effect of being British, but the thought of doing this makes me cringe greatly. However, it does actually work, and some people really like it, so if it sounds good to you then go for it. Here’s how to do it:

    You think of a person who really helped you out, that you never properly thanked. You write a letter to them, expressing your gratitude for all the lovely things they did for you. But you don’t post this letter off. Oh no. That would be too easy. What you actually do is go visit them in person, and read it out aloud to them. Then what happens, apparently, is you both get all emotional, and you might even both cry. But after this, your happiness gets a very large spike, which lasts a few weeks as you bask in the afterglow of appreciation. Then it gradually wears off, and you go back to normal. (8)

    9) Discover and Use Your Strengths

    People always tell you to ‘stick to your strengths’, and it’s actually pretty good advice. The more you work your strengths into your daily routine, the happier you get happier. I know because I did an experiment on this for my dissertation. But how do you know what your strengths are? In 2004, after a huge amount of research, a tome by the name of Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification was published. This volume classifies 24 character strengths, some of which you use a lot, while others you use very little.

    There’s a test you can take at authentichappiness.com, which will place the 24 strengths in rank order for you, so you’ll find which are your real strengths and which are more like weaknesses. It does take around 45 minutes though. After the test you’ll get some details on your top five strengths, which they call your signature strengths. Research has shown that if you deliberately make use of these strengths on a daily basis, you get happier. And it seems that the longer you do it for, the happier you get, although no research has been done past the 6 month mark. (8)

    The idea is to integrate the signature strengths into your daily lives. Find hobbies and interests that use them, rethink how you go about your work to use them more, and so on. There are some other ideas here (Click the strengths vs weaknesses link – it’s a Word document, scroll down to the appendix).

    10) Random Acts of Kindness

    Kindness, generosity, nurturance, altruism, or whatever you want to call it, is the cornerstone of most religious and ethical systems. For some reason, performing acts of kindness makes the giver as well as the receiver happier. Maybe it increases the sense of interdependence in the community, which is good for everyone. Maybe it’s because of the reciprocity principle – if you receive something, you are motivated to give back. This is why restaurants give you the mint instead of leaving it in a bowl – it makes people tip more!

    Again though, it works, whatever the reasons. College students who were asked to perform five acts of kindness, one a week for six weeks were significantly happier at the end of it. In another study, people were either asked to perform the same act of kindness, or varied acts of kindness for ten weeks. Interestingly the group performing the same act did not see an increase in happiness. Maybe it was the effect of adaptation, maybe just boredom; who knows? But it seems you must be a bit creative about your kindness for it to work for yourself. (10) (11)

    Two Final Thoughts…

    Mileage May Vary

    Well done if you’ve made it this far. There’s a lot to choose from, and now you might be wondering, what will work for me? In the experiments that these techniques were based on, there will undoubtedly be people for whom it didn’t work, and psychologists haven’t figured out yet which interventions are best for which people. Personally, I don’t like the idea of the gratitude letter, and writing about my best possible self. But other people will love them and benefit from them – there’s proof of this. Then again, maybe I would randomly find I love positive writing. Who knows? The point is, some trial and error may be required.

    Also, remember to give these techniques at least a full week, preferably a few, before you evaluate how good they are. And give them a fair try – you need to do them regularly and habitually for them to work in the longer-term. If you just want a bit of short-term happiness, go get a massage or something.

    Be Realistic

    The biggest block to happiness is not in the external world, but in our own psychology. The systems of happiness, pleasure and desire that we all possess are not there for our enjoyment; they are there to help the organism known as ‘the human’ function effectively. The body does not care if you are happy. If it can trick you into pursuing things that you think will make you happy, but actually are just helping you survive, then it will.

    If you become as materialistic as possible and do nothing but work and sleep, you’ll get pretty rich. With money comes security, you can buy a big house, good food, and enjoy high status. You can even get a gold digging wife or husband, and have some kids. Your body doesn’t care if you are unhappy all your life, as long as you survive and reproduce.

    That’s why you have to be a bit smarter when it comes to happiness. You have to know the system to work it. The above methods are the result of work people have done to that end. If any of them look appealing to you and you want to give them a try, by all means do it. It will probably work.

    But remember one thing; true and complete happiness is impossible to achieve. It’s not in the nature of happiness for it to be fully obtainable, nor is it possible for happiness to evolve so that it is fully obtainable. So don’t make happiness too big of a deal. It’s only one part of life. You’re not supposed to be happy all the time. There are other things in your life that you need to do, that require other emotional and mental states.

    Besides, if you focus on it too much, you’re not likely to get it. It’s often more effective to find engagement elsewhere, and let it come to you.

    Don’t think that you need some incredible life to be happy. Don’t think you need some spectacular level of happiness to be normal. We can use science to break happiness down into little pieces, and do experiments to see how to increase it, but experiments can’t tell you how happy you should be. Each individual person has to answer that themselves, and every answer will be different.

    Of course, if you don’t answer that question yourself, an answer will be provided for you. We’re inherent comparers, us humans. We’re always looking out for what other people have got. In a world with things like the internet, television and magazines, we’re constantly exposed to the most attractive, most talented, most charismatic of about 6 billion people: which can sometimes make us want too much.

    I found an interesting quote:

    “The world is full of people looking for spectacular happiness while they snub contentment”

    It doesn’t say who said it, but I think it’s worth keeping in mind.

    References

    In the first comment…

  • Happiness Measure: The Satisfaction With Life Scale

    I’ve previously explained how a specific definition of happiness can be measured – here’s an example of how it’s done.  The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) is one of many happiness measures used to quantify well being in this way.

    Now you could just ask people how happy they are on a scale of 1-10, and this would get you some useful information.  But the results would be slightly different depending on how you worded the question.  This particular scale uses five questions and takes an average.  This waters down the influence of wording.  The SWLS is widely used, and a lot of the research on happiness was done using this form.  I even used it myself, in my dissertation at university.

    Here it is:

    Below are five statements that you may agree or disgree with. Using the 1 – 7 scale below indicate your agreement with each item by placing the appropriate number on the line preceding that item. Please be open and honest in your responding.

    7 – Strongly agree
    6 – Agree
    5 – Slightly agree
    4 – Neither agree nor disgree
    3 – Slightly disagree
    2 – Disgree
    1 – Strongly disgree

    ____ In most ways my life is close to my ideal.

    ____ The conditions of my life are excellent.

    ____ I am satisfied with my life.

    ____ So far I have gotten the important things I want in life.

    ____ If I could live my life over, I would change almost nothing.
     
    Add up your results and see where you are in the following list:
     
    35 – 31  –  Extremely satisfied
    26 – 30  –  Satisfied
    21 – 25  –  Slightly satisfied
    20         –  Neutral
    15 – 19  –  Slightly dissatisfied
    10 – 14  –  Dissatisfied
    5 –  9     –  Extremely dissatisfied

    There are many other happiness questionnaires, but this is arguably the most widely used one.  If you’re interested, you can find more of them at the Authentic Happiness website.